Is this intentional functionality?
I’m on 1.3.5 on Windows 8.1
Is this intentional functionality?
I’m on 1.3.5 on Windows 8.1
Yes it is. Shouldn’t be?
It is very handy to have a quick access to archive within a project.
To my mind, if the items are done and not archived, they can serve as a reference for completed items. If they are archived, they should be out of view unless needed (in which case, you would look in the archive).
Not a big deal though, if others prefer it the way it is.
Brian, this is indeed intentional.
Ok, cool. Thanks for the replies.
I can always collapse the done section in projects anyway
Just to chime in on this - I can see why this is intended, but keeping both “done” and “archived” tasks grouped together defeats the purpose of archiving at all.
I personally have a lot of projects with TONS of tasks, so my archive/done lists can be cumbersome. Maybe a good middle ground would be to keep archived items in the project for those that would like to be able to see them, but put them in a separate list from the done items so that those of us that don’t want to see archived items can collapse that list.
I think this might be the right solution.
But doesn’t this apply to all actions? I don’t get the logic. If there is an archive function and I press the button I expect that all actions done are archived - no exceptions.
3 years have passed without action.