Hello Team, would it be an Idea to implement the idea of pomodoro timer/technik into Everdo? you have an great to org todos that its ideal for gtd, an so your users could do more with the tool.
thanks for this app! its great and your focus on privacy is great!
This has been suggested before, but it’s not clear what value is there to having an integrated timer vs using a second app. Myself, I always just use the standard phone timer app for implementing time blocks (pomodoro). Not even a dedicated app - why complicate a simple thing?
Thats was the point i thought about. on the left side your app: like a good unix app: do one thing and this great! on the other side: one app for the task mgnt and one app for the pomodoro…
the longer i think about it: your idea with the android timer is great simple, without one hunderd options and it runs…
so the left side wins everdo for everything
Depends what is meant with “global”
I guess this feature is not implemented if “global” means: Capturing from everywhere on your pc, even outside the everdo app.
Hello
Here are some new suggestions following my intensive use of everdo!
LINUX 1/ multi tag filter
I select an area and then filter a tag, this is not enough because I still have dozens of task titles to view.
Filtering with a 2nd or 3rd tag (existing) would be the TOP.
2/ full screen of a spot in edition or display in 1 click
Sometimes it’s a bit long because there is no sub-project or sub-task.
yes I use this possibility. If it is possible one day to add a click to enlarge the stain, it would be better. A bit like a lot of applications or editors that allow you to work without distraction.
Okay. I hope that a new version will arrive soon
At least one release of the desktop app will happen in 2021, possibly 2. The problem with the first one is that it requires also publishing the Android and iOS app at nearly the same time, otherwise it could have been published a while ago.
Hello! Congratulations with new release and new List A feature shipped -“Set due date relative to the repeating date”!
Another feature to set due date indirectly is in the List A: “Add the option to schedule actions by setting the due date as opposed to the start date”.
Unfortunately, such approach not fits to my workflow. In my way of thinking due date is a king. I wish to set due date directly in a first step, and only then set start date or repeating date relative to the due.
It seems to me that some time ago there was exactly-what-I-wish-feature in List A - something like “Repeating due date and set start date relative to the due date”. Now I can’t find it in roadmap, only discussions in the forum: 1, 2.
I believe these two refer to the same feature. You set a due date and an offset in days. The app derives the start date by subtracting the given offset form the given due date.
Hi
Not easy to find your way around these lists. I would prefer a traceable solution like uservoice.
If not, can you add your refusals (with your reasons as on the non-integration of sub-projects for example …), that would avoid new requests!
I redo my list. We discussed some but as I do not see them in : planned, maybe … never !
Here they are
EDITION
improved layout (bold …)
integration of a link to a file on the computer
integration of an image
TAGS
indicate the number of occurrences in the task management to be able to eliminate them
SEARCH
“etat” should find items with “etat” or “état”.
cross to clear the search field
SORT
by task name
date of creation of the task
MISCELLANEOUS
send an email to the everdo mailbox
Hide/show all notes in 2 icons
larger icons or possibility to enlarge the whole content of everdo
Hi
Whether it’s about the suggestions for the financial model, to have more development or these suggestions, I have no answers.
I am really disappointed.
Is it possible to answer me?
regards
The forum is not very active (it’s a pity) but there are already quite a few requests for improvements that have been made here (like the one above). In order to avoid unnecessary frustration, could you tell us if you plan to develop this software further or if it’s at the end of the road ? If the idea is rather to keep things as they are now (which is already very good), it would be interesting to know. If not, what are the obstacles and how can they be solved (problem of time? of money? of will?).
In any case, this software is already doing a great job.